BMB Reports 2024; 57(6): 273-280  https://doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2024-0018
Emerging paradigms in cancer cell plasticity
Hyunbin D. Huh & Hyun Woo Park*
Department of Biochemistry, Brain Korea 21 Project, College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
Correspondence to: Tel: +82-2-2123-2698; E-mail: hwp003@yonsei.ac.kr
Received: January 9, 2024; Revised: February 9, 2024; Accepted: April 5, 2024; Published online: April 17, 2024.
© Korean Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. All rights reserved.

cc This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ABSTRACT
Cancer cells metastasize to distant organs by altering their characteristics within the tumor microenvironment (TME) to effectively overcome challenges during the multistep tumorigenesis. Plasticity endows cancer cell with the capacity to shift between different morphological states to invade, disseminate, and seed metastasis. The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a theory derived from tissue biopsy, which explains the acquisition of EMT transcription factors (TFs) that convey mesenchymal features during cancer migration and invasion. On the other hand, adherent-to-suspension transition (AST) is an emerging theory derived from liquid biopsy, which describes the acquisition of hematopoietic features by AST-TFs that reprograms anchorage dependency during the dissemination of circulating tumor cells (CTCs). The induction and plasticity of EMT and AST dynamically reprogram cell-cell interaction and cell-matrix interaction during cancer dissemination and colonization. Here, we review the mechanisms governing cellular plasticity of AST and EMT during the metastatic cascade and discuss therapeutic challenges posed by these two morphological adaptations to provide insights for establishing new therapeutic interventions.
Keywords: Anti-metastatic drug, AST (adherent-to-suspension transition), CTC (circulating tumor cell), Dissemination, EMT (epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition), Liquid biopsy, Metastasis
INTRODUCTION

Metastasis, the primary cause of cancer deaths (1), occurs through a multistep cascade (2), beginning with the detachment of cancer cells from the primary tumor, which is followed by local invasion into the surrounding tissue (3), intravasation into blood or lymphatic vessels (4), survival of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) (5), extravasation (6), colonization of a distant organ (7), and culminating in the growth of a secondary tumor. Critical cellular traits are acquired at each step of the metastatic cascade as cells transition through distinct states in which they gain new phenotypic and functional features (8, 9). While lineage differentiation was once considered unidirectional and irreversible, cell identity is now known to be far more plastic than previously assumed. Cellular plasticity is the capacity of cells to undergo reprogramming and alter their fate and identity in response to intrinsic or extrinsic factors (10). For example, over the past few decades, researchers have identified reprogramming factors capable of dedifferentiating mature cells into pluripotent stem cells (11-15). Moreover, cellular plasticity allows tumor cells to transition between the different cell types to overcome specific challenges (16).

In terms of cancer cell morphology, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a reprogramming process by EMT-TFs, which promotes loss of epithelial cell-cell contacts and acquires mesenchymal features, has long been recognized for its critical role in cancer progression and metastasis (17). On the other hand, the adherent-to-suspension transition (AST) is an emerging reprogramming process that facilitate metastatic dissemination by allowing adherent solid tumor cells to escape anchorage dependence and primary tumor sites. Recently, it was discovered that a combination of four defined factors orchestrates the AST plasticity in cancer cells, thereby reprogramming their anchorage dependency and fostering metastatic dissemination (18, 19). This review primarily delves into the recent insights into the biology of EMT and AST plasticity, and their relationship during cancer metastasis.

EMT AND METASTASIS

During EMT, cells from the epithelial state, characterized by cell-cell junctions and polarity, shift to the mesenchymal state, which loses cell-to-cell adhesions and acquires migratory and invasive behavior. Initially identified in the context of embryonic development where it takes part in gastrulation, EMT was subsequently implicated in various human diseases including fibrosis and cancer progression (20). EMT can be induced by pleiotropic signaling factors, including TGFβ, Wnt, Notch, or inflammatory cytokines. These then trigger the expression of specific transcription factors, notably SNAI1/2, TWIST1, and ZEB1/2, which are collectively referred to as EMT-TFs (21). EMT is often confirmed by testing for pronounced changes in the expression of epithelial markers, such as E-cadherin, occludins, and cytokeratin, as well as mesenchymal markers like N-cadherin and vimentin.

The activation of EMT-TFs plays critical roles during the invasive process (Fig. 1A). Jing et al. initially reported the significance of EMT-TFs in metastasis, identifying an essential role for Twist1 in the metastasis of breast cancer cell lines (22). Furthermore, reducing Snail expression inhibited metastasis development in PyMT breast cancer model (23) and deletion of genes encoding Zeb1 impaired metastasis in pancreatic cancer models (24). Hence, the loss of cell-cell adhesion molecules through EMT-TFs enables cancer cells to dissociate from their primary tumor. This subsequently triggers the formation of stress fibers, which then regulate cofilin and actin, thus facilitating the dynamic reorganization of the cytoskeleton and cell cycle (25, 26).

The tumor niche’s microenvironment plays a crucial role in inducing EMT and initiating metastasis. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) support tumor cells by secreting extracellular matrix and matrix metalloproteinases, promoting migration, invasion, and angiogenesis. Additionally, they induce EMT in cancer cells by activating autocrine and paracrine secretion of TGFβ (27). Following the initial stages of local invasion, cells that undergone EMT have been shown to be located at the invasive front and begin to penetrate the blood or lymphatic vessels. Cells that manage to enter the circulation are referred to as CTCs, only a portion of which manage to survive and extravasate into the secondary organ (Fig. 1B). Overexpression of Twist1 in mouse skin squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) promotes tumor invasion and intravasation of tumor cells into the bloodstream, producing CTCs with EMT traits (28). Furthermore, the EMT process facilitates the release of CTCs by promoting angiogenesis, as shown by the expression of the angiogenic factor and EMT target gene VEGF-A, in CTCs isolated from breast cancer patients (29). EMT also induces protein hydrolase, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), to enhance the migration of tumor cells (30). Analyses of patient blood suggest that MMPs production by CTCs could serve as a functional marker for cells possessing metastasis-enabling properties (31, 32). Unlike epithelial cells, which undergo anoikis upon the loss of cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) signals during intravasation, EMT-associated survival signals enables CTCs to acquire anoikis resistance and evade cell death (33).

Nevertheless, recent reports have cast doubt on the indispensability of EMT in cancer metastasis (34). The collective invasion of tumor cells, coupled with sustained expression of E-cadherin or EMT-independent phenotypes, has been linked to heightened metastatic capacity and unfavorable prognosis (35-37). Moreover, clustered CTCs, which arise from oligoclonal tumor cell aggregates harbors epithelial properties and exhibit greater aggressiveness in metastasis than single CTCs (38-45). The contribution of EMT in metastasis has been further questioned by several studies. In the first study, Fsp-1 GFP-reporter lines were used to monitor the expression of mesenchymal markers in a MMTV-PyMT breast cancer model, which revealed that GFP-positive cells, indicative of EMT, did not significantly contribute to metastatic outgrowths (46). Another study found that targeted loss of either Snail or Twist in the pancreas did not hinder cancer dissemination or metastasis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (47). Collectively, these findings prompted the field to question the necessity of EMT for metastasis and suggested the need for an alternative paradigm to explain the metastatic cascade that do not involve EMT.

AST AND METASTASIS

Until now, the mechanisms governing the reprogramming of anchorage dependency, a key morphological shift from adherent solid tumor cells to suspended CTCs during cancer metastasis, have remained unexplored. The question of what regulates the detachment of cancer cells from the matrix at the primary tumor site has remained unanswered. Recently, a novel theory was introduced showing that adherent-to-suspension transition (AST) in cancer cells can be induced by a combination of defined hematopoietic factors, which were critical for the dissemination of CTCs. This discovery reveals the role of hematopoietic mimicry of solid tumor cells and suggests AST factors as potential therapeutic targets for anti-metastatic drug development.

Analyses of gene expression profiles across a broad spectrum of adherent and suspension-type cells revealed transcription factors exclusively expressed in hematopoietic-like suspension cells, which were termed AST factors. The ectopic expression of AST factors, including ikaros zinc finger family 1 (IKZF1), nuclear factor erythroid 2 (NFE2), interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8), and BTG anti-proliferation factor (BTG2), has been shown to directly convert adherent cells into suspension-type cells (Fig. 2A) by modulating cell-matrix adhesion and extracellular matrix (ECM) organization. Although these four AST factors play a role in blood cell development (48-52), they do not induce hematopoietic lineage differentiation when expressed in cancer cells. Following cellular detachment from the matrix, cells typically undergo a form of programmed cell death or anoikis, however, AST-TFs promote anoikis resistance simultaneously. Furthermore, AST factors evoke global suppression of genes related to focal adhesion assembly and integrin-ECM interaction by inhibiting the effectors of Hippo pathway, YAP and TEAD. This is consistent with previous reports implicating YAP/TEAD in facilitating cell-ECM interaction in cancer cells though upregulation of integrin and ECM-related genes (53-56). The physiological loss of anchorage dependency leads to increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and anoikis (57). AST factors confer anoikis resistance by reducing ROS levels through the upregulation of HBA1/2 gene expression, which is otherwise found primarily in red blood cells (RBCs). A recent report demonstrated that CTCs disseminated from primary tumor alter their expression of hemoglobin genes to overcome ROS-induced cell death (58). These data suggest AST is a physio-pathologically relevant cellular process that governs the metastatic dissemination and survival of CTCs.

Through single-cell RNA sequencing analysis of paired samples from primary tumors and blood collected from de novo metastatic patients, as well as fatpad-to-lung metastasis mouse model, increased expression of the four AST factors was observed in CTCs compared to their counterparts in the primary tumor. The downregulation of YAP/TEAD and the induction of globin genes in CTCs were also recapitulated, underscoring the key mechanisms involved in the AST process. The critical role of AST factors in the metastatic dissemination is supported by results showing that blocking AST via shRNA impedes both the dissemination of CTCs from the primary tumor and their metastatic capability without altering primary tumor growth. Blocking the AST-induced reprogramming of anchorage dependency with immunomodulatory drugs (iMIDs) like lenalidomide and pomalidomide, which selectively degrade IKZF1(59, 60), significantly suppresses metastasis. These studies demonstrate the potential for developing therapeutic interventions that target AST factors as anti-metastatic agents (Fig. 2B).

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMT AND AST

Epithelial cells maintain cell-cell adhesions via cellular structures like tight junctions (TJs), adherence junctions (AJs) and desmosomes. EMT evokes the loss of cell-cell adhesion molecules, typically via the downregulation of E-cadherin, which is one of the critical components of the AJs (61). In contrast, AST involves the reprogramming of anchorage dependency through the dissociation of integrin-matrix adhesion rather than cell-cell adhesions, raising the question regarding the relationship between the modulation of cell-ECM interaction via AST and cell-cell interaction via EMT. According to recent reports, AST can be induced in both epithelial and mesenchymal cancer cells without altering the expression of EMT markers, such as E-cadherin, N-cadherin, or vimentin (Fig. 3) (62). Moreover, epithelial cells in an AST-induced suspended state maintained similar expression level and cell surface localization of E-cadherin between cell-cell junctions, suggesting that AST factors could reprogram anchorage dependency via mechanisms distinct from those of EMT. The independency of AST from EMT theory offers an alternative mechanism to explain metastasis that are seemingly unrelated to EMT. Cancer cells undergoing EMT, however, acquire highly migratory and invasive properties through ECM remodeling, characterized by increased ECM synthesis, deposition, and remodeling enzymes like MMPs (63). Thus, exploring how EMT-induced restructuring of the ECM affects the cell-matrix dissociation triggered by AST warrants further investigation.

PLASTICITY OF EMT AND AST

During development, EMT-driven mesenchymal-like cells reclaim their epithelial phenotype through mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET), a reverse process of EMT (64). In tumor metastasis, the mesenchymal state induced by EMT promotes the local invasion of cancer cells from the primary tumor, leading to the intravasation of individual CTCs with increased survival signals preventing anoikis. Despite the increase in invasiveness resulting from the loss of epithelial traits, the reversion of EMT through MET is required for the outgrowth of cancer cells after they colonize distant organs (Fig. 3). While EMT-MET plasticity has typically been considered a dichotomous switch, the field have reframed the concept of EMT as existing along a continuum of intermediate or hybrid EMT states characterized by diverse levels of both epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes that express combinations of epithelial and mesenchymal cell markers (65, 66). This broader concept of EMT plasticity suggests cancer cells can acquire specific adaptations to challenges they encounter during both dissemination and colonization (67). A screen of a large panel of cell surface markers in skin and mammary primary tumors showed multiple tumor subpopulations linked to different EMT spectra, ranging from epithelial to complete EMT, as well as hybrid EMT states (68). Cancer cells seldom undergo complete EMT, opting instead for partial EMT. It is these partial EMT cells that contribute to lung metastasis, whereas cells that undergone full EMT much less efficiently colonize the lung (69).

The plasticity of AST has been demonstrated in various cellular context. The reversible nature of shifting AST to SAT (suspension-to-adherent transition) have been shown via the Tet-ON system, which allowed for doxycycline-induced expression of the AST factors. We observed that cells driven into suspension by doxycycline-induced AST factor expression reverted to an adherent morphology upon doxycycline withdrawal, confirming that AST factor expression level underlies AST-SAT plasticity. Furthermore, corroborating the relevance of AST plasticity with additional physiological evidence, a notable increase in AST factor expression was observed in melanoma CTCs, followed by their subsequent repression in the metastatic lesions of the lung. These findings demonstrate that AST factor expression induces hematopoietic mimicry in cancer cells, governing the dissemination of CTCs from the primary tumor site. Subsequently, the spatial and temporal modulation of anchorage dependency afforded by AST plasticity permits the restoration of adhesive properties that facilitate the colonization of secondary organs (Fig. 4). We expect deeper insights into AST plasticity to prove crucial in the development of novel drugs that can elucidate and target the specific stages of metastasis progression that depend on the AST-SAT spectrum.

CHALLENGES, FUTURE DIRECTIONS, AND PERSPECTIVES

Described initially as a pivotal occurrence in embryonic morphogenesis, the roles of EMT in diverse physiological and pathological processes, including cancer metastasis, are now well-established. The AST, which was initially introduced into the context of cancer metastasis, is now appreciated not only in the context of morphological changes required for the dissemination of cancer metastasis but also in situations unexplained by EMT. The molecular mechanisms and dynamics that regulate EMT- and AST-related cancer cell heterogeneity should be investigated to understand how rare population of primary tumor cells generates CTCs and succeeds in metastasis. Given that metastatic cancer cells undergo repeated cycles of losing and gaining specific cell fates as they advance through the multi-step process of the metastatic cascade, there are significant challenges associated with targeting the plasticity of cellular reprogramming during cancer progression. Cancer metastasis requires the upregulation of EMT and AST during the dissemination phase, as well as their suppression upon colonization. Although reports have highlighted the importance of such flexibility in the EMT and AST during metastasis, the factors that determine specific EMT and AST status of cancer cells in vivo remain unclear, as do the means of identifying which step to inhibit to effectively block metastasis. Furthermore, due to the presence of wide spectrum of EMT and AST states, determining the extent to which cells should be reversed remains uncertain (70), underscoring the need for careful characterization in the development of anti-EMT or anti-AST agents.

Despite significant progress in identifying the AST phenomenon and understanding the cellular reprogramming of anchorage dependency leading to the dissemination of CTCs, several questions remain unanswered. Considering the identification of extrinsic factors that induce EMT in cancer progression, we wonder what stimulants and signaling factors in the metastatic microenvironment of the primary tumor site can induce the expression of AST factors. Is AST-SAT plasticity a binary process, or does it involve intermediate states akin to the metastable EMT hybrid states? How do individual AST factors orchestrate the conversion of adherent primary tumors into suspended CTCs?

AST occurs broadly via two sequential steps: 1) a spontaneous dissociation of cell-matrix adhesion through a global suppression of integrin and ECM-related gene expression, followed by 2) the acquisition of anoikis resistance via globin gene induction. Building on previous reports that identified the roles of the four AST factors in determining blood cell lineage differentiation, it would be interesting to determine how each AST factor acts either independently or synergistically to drive each process. During B-cell development, IKZF1 acts as a transcriptional repressor, suppressing an extra-lineage transcription network that includes YAP and TEAD to regulate the gene expression related to cell-ECM interactions (71). In addition, deficiency and/or mutation of IKZF1 leading to its dysfunction or mislocalization via increased cell-stroma adhesion and decreased drug sensitivity is associated with a poor prognosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (72-75). These suggest IKZF1 could be primarily involved in the initial step of AST by disrupting cell-ECM adhesion, whereas NFE2, which serves as key coordinator of globin gene expression (76), could play a potential role in achieving anoikis resistance during the second step of AST.

CONCLUDING REMARKS

This review underscores the significance of cellular plasticity in both EMT and AST during cancer metastasis. The dynamic modulation of cancer cell plasticity in both cell-cell and cell-ECM networks is crucial in the cellular adaptations necessary for overcoming the diverse challenges throughout the metastatic cascade. A deeper understanding of the EMT and AST-related plasticity that regulates cellular behavior and morphology will likely guide the development of novel therapeutic strategies for overcoming metastasis and prolong patient survival.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by grants from the National Research Foundation of Korea (2020M3F7A1094077, 2020M3F7A1094089, 2021R1A2C1010828, 2020R1A4A1019063, 2018R1C1B6004301) to HWP, and by the Brain Korea 21 FOUR Program to H.D.H.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicting interests.

FIGURES
Fig. 1. The significance of EMT in cancer metastasis. (A) A schematic overview illustrating the mechanistic details of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). During EMT, cell transition from an epithelial state to a mesenchymal state, marked by the loss of cell-to-cell adhesions and the acquisition of migratory characteristics. The verification of EMT often involves examining substantial changes in the expression of epithelial markers like E-cadherin, Occludins, and Cytokeratin, as well as mesenchymal markers such as N-cadherin and vimentin. (B) The significant functions of EMT on the invasive progression of cancer metastasis. EMT triggers the activation of protein hydrolases, including matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), to amplify the migratory capabilities of tumor cells. Additionally, the EMT mechanism expedites the liberation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) by fostering angiogenesis.
Fig. 2. The reprogramming of anchorage dependency by AST in cancer metastasis. (A) A schematic overview of the mechanistic details of adherent-to-suspension transition (AST). The reprogramming of anchorage dependency from adherent-type to suspension-type cells is a cell-autonomous process achieved via the expression of a defined set of hematopoietic transcription factors, namely IKZF1, NFE2, BTG2, and IRF8. AST induction results in the spontaneous loss of cell-matrix interaction mediated by YAP/TEAD signaling and the acquisition of anoikis resistance through HBA1/2-induced suppression of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). (B) The pivotal role of AST factors in metastatic dissemination in vivo. The expression of AST factors during the dissemination stages of cancer metastasis facilitates the generation of CTCs and metastatic spread. This is consistent with in vitro findings that AST-induced cells exhibit low YAP-TEAD axis activity and increased expression of hemoglobin genes. This process can also be inhibited by iMIDs, suggesting that novel therapeutic interventions targeting AST should be capable of attenuating metastasis.
Fig. 3. The relationship between AST and EMT. While EMT is associated with changes in the composition of molecules associated with ‘cell-cell’ contact, the reprogramming of anchorage dependency associated with AST is achieved through a dynamic modulation of ‘cell-matrix’ adhesion. AST-driven suspension cells could be generated from adherent cell types regardless of their epithelial or mesenchymal traits without altering their cell-cell adhesion.
Fig. 4. The role of AST and EMT plasticity in metastasis. The fluctuation of EMT and AST factors expression throughout the metastatic cascade. (1) An increase in EMT factor expression is linked to the invasion and intravasation of cancer cells from primary masses; (2-3) A marked expression of AST factors is associated with cancer cell detachment from the primary tumor site, leading to the formation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and an increase in their survival along the circulation of blood; (4) CTCs retained in the bloodstream regain their adhesive characteristics through a substantial reduction in AST expression at metastatic sites, facilitating successful invasion into distant organs. (5) MET induced by a decrease in the expression of EMT factors is essential for the outgrowth of metastatic tumor colonized in secondary sites.
REFERENCES
  1. Mehlen P and Puisieux A (2006) Metastasis: a question of life or death. Nat Rev Cancer 6, 449-458.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Gupta GP and Massague J (2006) Cancer metastasis: building a framework. Cell 127, 679-695.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Stuelten CH, Parent CA and Montell DJ (2018) Cell motility in cancer invasion and metastasis: insights from simple model organisms. Nat Rev Cancer 18, 296-312.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Reymond N, d'Agua BB and Ridley AJ (2013) Crossing the endothelial barrier during metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 13, 858-870.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Micalizzi DS, Maheswaran S and Haber DA (2017) A conduit to metastasis: circulating tumor cell biology. Genes Dev 31, 1827-1840.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Wirtz D, Konstantopoulos K and Searson PC (2011) The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 11, 512-522.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Massague J and Obenauf AC (2016) Metastatic colonization by circulating tumour cells. Nature 529, 298-306.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Perez-Gonzalez A, Bevant K and Blanpain C (2023) Cancer cell plasticity during tumor progression, metastasis and response to therapy. Nat Cancer 4, 1063-1082.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Kim OH, Jeon TJ, Shin YK and Lee HJ (2023) Role of extrinsic physical cues in cancer progression. BMB Rep 56, 287-295.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Huyghe A, Trajkova A and Lavial F (2024) Cellular plasticity in reprogramming, rejuvenation and tumorigenesis: a pioneer TF perspective. Trends Cell Biol 34, 255-267.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Takahashi K, Tanabe K and Ohnuki M et al (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861-872.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Takahashi K and Yamanaka S (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663-676.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Ambasudhan R, Talantova M and Coleman R et al (2011) Direct reprogramming of adult human fibroblasts to functional neurons under defined conditions. Cell Stem Cell 9, 113-118.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Ieda M, Fu J and Delgado-Olguin P et al (2011) Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes by defined factors. Cell 142, 375-386.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Pereira CF, Fu J and Delgado-Olguin P et al (2013) Induction of a hemogenic program in mouse fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell 13, 205-218.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. da Silva-Diz V, Lorenzo-Sanz L, Bernat-Peguera A, Lopez-Cerda M and Muñoz P (2018) Cancer cell plasticity: impact on tumor progression and therapy response. Semin Cancer Biol 53, 48-58.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Nieto MA, Huang RY, Jackson RA and Thiery JP (2016) Emt: 2016. Cell 166, 21-45.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Huh HD, Sub Y and Oh J et al (2023) Reprogramming anchorage dependency by adherent-to-suspension transition promotes metastatic dissemination. Mol Cancer 22, 63.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Marabitti V, Caruana I and Nazio F (2023) Should I stay or should I go? Spatio-temporal control of cellular anchorage by hematopoietic factors orchestrates tumor metastatic cascade. Mol Cancer 22, 149.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  20. Lamouille S, Xu J and Derynck R (2014) Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15, 178-196.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  21. Huang Y, Hong W and Wei X (2022) The molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies of EMT in tumor progression and metastasis. J Hematol Oncol 15, 129.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Yang J, Mani SA and Donaher JL et al (2004) Twist, a master regulator of morphogenesis, plays an essential role in tumor metastasis. Cell 117, 927-939.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Ni T, Li X and Lu N et al (2016) Snail1-dependent p53 repression regulates expansion and activity of tumour-initiating cells in breast cancer. Nat Cell Biol 18, 1221-1232.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  24. Krebs AM, Mitschke J and Losada ML et al (2017) The EMT-activator Zeb1 is a key factor for cell plasticity and promotes metastasis in pancreatic cancer. Nat Cell Biol 19, 518-529.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Sun BO, Fang Y, Li Z, Chen Z and Xiang J (2015) Role of cellular cytoskeleton in epithelial-mesenchymal transition process during cancer progression. Biomed Rep 3, 603-610.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  26. Hong O, Kang SY and Noh E et al (2022) Aurora kinase A induces migration and invasion by inducing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in colon cancer cells. BMB Rep 55, 87-91.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  27. Shi X, Luo J and Weigel KJ et al (2021) Cancer-associated fibroblasts facilitate squamous cell carcinoma lung metastasis in mice by providing TGFbeta-mediated cancer stem cell niche. Front Cell Dev Biol 9, 668164.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  28. Tsai JH, Donaher JL, Murphy DA, Chau S and Yang J (2012) Spatiotemporal regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition is essential for squamous cell carcinoma metastasis. Cancer Cell 22, 725-736.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  29. Kallergi G, Markomanolaki H and Giannoukaraki V et al (2009) Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in circulating tumor cells of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res 11, R84.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Chen P and Parks WC (2009) Role of matrix metalloproteinases in epithelial migration. J Cell Biochem 108, 1233-1243.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Grzechocinska B, Dabrowski FA and Cyganek A et al (2014) Serum levels and tissue expression of matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2 (TIMP-2) in colorectal cancer patients. Tumour Biol 35, 3793-3802.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Dhar M, Lam JN, Walser T, Dubinett SM, Rettig MB and Carlo DD (2018) Functional profiling of circulating tumor cells with an integrated vortex capture and single-cell protease activity assay. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115, 9986-9991.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Cao Z, Livas T and Kyprianou N (2016) Anoikis and EMT: lethal "Liaisons" during cancer progression. Crit Rev Oncog 21, 155-168.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Williams ED, Gao D, Redfern A and Thompson EW (2019) Controversies around epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in cancer metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 19, 716-732.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  35. Gao J, Zhu Y, Nilsson M and Sundfeldt K (2014) TGF-beta isoforms induce EMT independent migration of ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Cell Int 14, 72.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  36. Chung YC, Wei WC and Hung CN et al (2016) Rab11 collaborates E-cadherin to promote collective cell migration and indicates a poor prognosis in colorectal carcinoma. Eur J Clin Invest 46, 1002-1011.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  37. Cheung KJ, Gabrielson E, Werb Z and Ewald AJ (2013) Collective invasion in breast cancer requires a conserved basal epithelial program. Cell 155, 1639-1651.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  38. Aceto N, Bardia A and Miyamoto DT et al (2014) Circulating tumor cell clusters are oligoclonal precursors of breast cancer metastasis. Cell 158, 1110-1122.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  39. Gkountela S, Castro-Giner F and Szczerba BM et al (2019) Circulating tumor cell clustering shapes DNA methylation to enable metastasis seeding. Cell 176, 98-112.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  40. Mu Z, Wang C and Ye Z et al (2015) Prospective assessment of the prognostic value of circulating tumor cells and their clusters in patients with advanced-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 154, 563-571.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Wang C, Mu Z and Chervoneva I et al (2017) Longitudinally collected CTCs and CTC-clusters and clinical outcomes of metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 161, 83-94.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Murlidhar V, Reddy RM and Fouladdel S et al (2017) Poor prognosis indicated by venous circulating tumor cell clusters in early-stage lung cancers. Cancer Res 77, 5194-5206.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  43. Krol I, Castro-Giner F and Maurer M et al (2018) Detection of circulating tumour cell clusters in human glioblastoma. Br J Cancer 119, 487-491.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  44. Jansson S, Bendahl PO, Larsson AM, Aaltonen KE and Rydén L (2016) Prognostic impact of circulating tumor cell apoptosis and clusters in serial blood samples from patients with metastatic breast cancer in a prospective observational cohort. BMC Cancer 16, 433.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  45. Klameth L, Rath B and Hochmaier M et al (2017) Small cell lung cancer: model of circulating tumor cell tumorospheres in chemoresistance. Sci Rep 7, 5337.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  46. Fischer KR, Durrans A and Lee S et al (2015) Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is not required for lung metastasis but contributes to chemoresistance. Nature 527, 472-476.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  47. Zheng X, Carstens JL and Kim J et al (2015) Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is dispensable for metastasis but induces chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer. Nature 527, 525-530.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  48. Seng A and Yankee TM (2017) The role of the ikaros family of transcription factors in regulatory T cell development and function. J Clin Cell Immunol 8, 495.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  49. Sellars M, Kastner P and Chan S (2011) Ikaros in B cell development and function. World J Biol Chem 2, 132-139.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  50. Andrews NC, Erdjument-Bromage H, Davidson MB, Tempst P and Orkin SH (1993) Erythroid transcription factor NF-E2 is a haematopoietic-specific basic-leucine zipper protein. Nature 362, 722-728.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. Tamura T, Kurotaki D and Koizumi S (2015) Regulation of myelopoiesis by the transcription factor IRF8. Int J Hematol 101, 342-351.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  52. Tijchon E, van Emst L and Yuniati L et al (2016) Tumor suppressors BTG1 and BTG2 regulate early mouse B-cell development. Haematologica 101, e272-e276.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  53. Dupont S, Morsut L and Aragona M et al (2011) Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 474, 179-183.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  54. Nardone G, Oliver-De La Cruz J and Vrbsky J et al (2017) YAP regulates cell mechanics by controlling focal adhesion assembly. Nat Commun 8, 15321.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  55. Lee YC, Lin SC and Yu G et al (2022) Prostate tumor-induced stromal reprogramming generates Tenascin C that promotes prostate cancer metastasis through YAP/TAZ inhibition. Oncogene 41, 757-769.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  56. Shin JE, Kim SH and Kong M et al (2023) Targeting FLT3-TAZ signaling to suppress drug resistance in blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Mol Cancer 22, 177.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  57. Labuschagne CF, Cheung EC, Blagih J, Domart MC and Vousden KH (2019) Cell clustering promotes a metabolic switch that supports metastatic colonization. Cell Metab 30, 720-734.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  58. Zheng Y, Miyamoto DT and Wittner BS et al (2017) Expression of beta-globin by cancer cells promotes cell survival during blood-borne dissemination. Nat Commun 8, 14344.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  59. Krönke J, Udeshi ND and Narla A et al (2014) Lenalidomide causes selective degradation of IKZF1 and IKZF3 in multiple myeloma cells. Science 343, 301-305.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  60. Lu G, Middleton RE and Sun H et al (2014) The myeloma drug lenalidomide promotes the cereblon-dependent destruction of Ikaros proteins. Science 343, 305-309.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  61. Bras GFL, Taubenslag KJ and Andl CD (2012) The regulation of cell-cell adhesion during epithelial-mesenchymal transition, motility and tumor progression. Cell Adh Migr 6, 365-373.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  62. Huh HD, Sub Y and Oh J et al (2023) Reprogramming anchorage dependency by adherent-to-suspension transition promotes metastatic dissemination. Mol Cancer 22, 63.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  63. Yuan Z, Li Y and Zhang S et al (2023) Extracellular matrix remodeling in tumor progression and immune escape: from mechanisms to treatments. Mol Cancer 22, 48.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  64. Haerinck J, Goossens S and Berx G (2023) The epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity landscape: principles of design and mechanisms of regulation. Nat Rev Genet 24, 590-609.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  65. Meyer-Schaller N, Cardner M and Diepenbruck M et al (2019) A hierarchical regulatory landscape during the multiple stages of EMT. Dev Cell 48, 539-553.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  66. Jolly MK, Tripathi SC and Jia D et al (2016) Stability of the hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype. Oncotarget 7, 27067-27084.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  67. Yang J, Antin P and Berx G et al (2020) Guidelines and definitions for research on epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 21, 341-352.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  68. Pastushenko I, Brisebarre A and Sifrim A et al (2018) Identification of the tumour transition states occurring during EMT. Nature 556, 463-468.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  69. Lüönd F, Sugiyama N and Bill R et al (2021) Distinct contributions of partial and full EMT to breast cancer malignancy. Dev Cell 56, 3203-3221.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  70. Nieto MA (2013) Epithelial plasticity: a common theme in embryonic and cancer cells. Science 342, 1234850.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  71. Hu Y, Zhang Z and Kashiwagi M et al (2016) Superenhancer reprogramming drives a B-cell-epithelial transition and high-risk leukemia. Genes Dev 30, 1971-1990.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  72. Joshi I, Yoshida T and Jena N et al (2014) Loss of Ikaros DNA-binding function confers integrin-dependent survival on pre-B cells and progression to acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Immunol 15, 294-304.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  73. Churchman ML, Low J and Qu C et al (2015) Efficacy of retinoids in IKZF1-mutated BCR-ABL1 acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Cell 28, 343-356.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  74. Churchman ML, Evans K and Richmond J et al (2016) Synergism of FAK and tyrosine kinase inhibition in Ph(+) B-ALL. JCI Insight 1, e86082.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  75. Churchman ML, Qian M and Kronnie GT et al (2018) Germline genetic IKZF1 variation and predisposition to childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Cell 33, 937-948.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  76. Andrews NC (1994) Erythroid transcription factor NF-E2 coordinates hemoglobin synthesis. Pediatr Res 36, 419-423.
    Pubmed CrossRef


This Article


Cited By Articles
  • CrossRef (0)

Funding Information
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
      10.13039/501100003725
      2020M3F7A1094077, 2020M3F7A1094089, 2021R1A2C1010828, 2020R1A4A1019063, 2018R1C1B6004301
  • Brain Korea 21 FOUR Program
     

Collections

Services
Social Network Service

e-submission

Archives