BMB Reports 2022; 55(10): 488-493
Structural resemblance of the DNAJA-family protein, Tid1, to the DNAJB-family Hsp40
Jinhwa Jang1,# , Sung-Hee Lee1,# , Dong-Hoon Kang1 , Dae-Won Sim2 , Kyung-Suk Ryu3 , Ku-Sung Jo2 , Jinhyuk Lee4,5 , Hyojung Ryu6,7 , Eun-Hee Kim3 , Hyung-Sik Won2,8,* & Ji-Hun Kim1,*
1College of Pharmacy, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28160, 2Department of Biotechnology, Research Institute (RIBHS) and College of Biomedical and Health Science, Konkuk University, Chungju 27478, 3Research Center for Bioconvergence Analysis, Korea Basic Science Institute, Cheongju 28119, 4Genome Editing Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Daejeon 34141, 5Department of Bioinformatics, KRIBB School of Bioscience, University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, 6Korean Genomics Center (KOGIC), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan 44919, 7Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Information and Biotechnology, UNIST, Ulsan 44919, 8BK21 Project Team, Department of Applied Life Science, Graduate School, Konkuk University, Chungju 27478, Korea
Correspondence to: Ji-Hun Kim, Tel: +82-43-249-1343; Fax: +82-43-268-2732; E-mail:; Hyung-Sik Won, Tel: +82-43-840-3589; Fax: +82-43-840-3048; E-mail:
#These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received: March 18, 2022; Revised: April 11, 2022; Accepted: May 18, 2022; Published online: October 31, 2022.
© Korean Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. All rights reserved.

cc This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The specific pair of heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) and Hsp40 constitutes an essential molecular chaperone system involved in numerous cellular processes, including the proper folding/refolding and transport of proteins. Hsp40 family members are characterized by the presence of a conserved J-domain (JD) that functions as a co-chaperone of Hsp70. Tumorous imaginal disc 1 (Tid1) is a tumor suppressor protein belonging to the DNAJA3 subfamily of Hsp40 and functions as a co-chaperone of the mitochondrial Hsp70, mortalin. In this work, we performed nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to determine the solution structure of JD and its interaction with the glycine/phenylalaninerich region (GF-motif) of human Tid1. Notably, Tid1-JD, whose conformation was consistent with that of the DNAJB1 JD, appeared to stably interact with its subsequent GF-motif region. Collectively with our sequence analysis, the present results demonstrate that the functional and regulatory mode of Tid1 resembles that of the DNAJB1 subfamily members rather than DNAJA1 or DNAJA2 subfamily proteins. Therefore, it is suggested that an allosteric interaction between mortalin and Tid1 is involved in the mitochondrial Hsp70/Hsp40 chaperone system.
Keywords: DNAJ family, GF-motif, Hsp40, Hsp70, J-domain, Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Tid1

Molecular chaperones, essentially including heat shock proteins (Hsps), are recognized as a protein quality control machinery that operates to ensure cellular proteostasis (i.e., protein homeostasis) (1-3). The specific pair of Hsp70 and Hsp40, including their bacterial orthologs, DnaK and DnaJ, respectively (4), is one of the canonical chaperone systems that is ubiquitously present in all living organisms and interacts with many different substrates, via an adenine nucleotide-dependent cycle (5-7). In this machinery, Hsp70, which contains ATPase and substrate-binding domains, functions as a core chaperone, whereas Hsp40 acts as a co-chaperone of Hsp70. Hsp40 recruits polypeptide substrates to Hsp70, stimulates the hydrolysis of ATP bound to Hsp70, and stabilizes Hsp70 substrate interactions (8-10).

The Hsp40 family proteins generally share several characteristic domains/motifs, including a J-domain (JD), a glycine/phenylalanine-rich region (GF-motif), a cysteine repeat region containing a zinc-finger-like motif, and substrate-binding domains. Particularly, the highly conserved JD is recognized as a principle region of Hsp40 for its interaction with Hsp70, whereas the other regions are presumed to facilitate the targeting of Hsp70 chaperones to specific substrates (11). Both the overall primary sequences and the composition and organization of structural domains vary in individual Hsp40 proteins. For instance, in humans, Hsp40s comprise a variety of subfamilies with more than 40 different members, which vary in their substrate selectivity and individual functions in cells. Based on the structural components, the Hsp40 family is divided into three groups: DNAJA, DNAJB, and DNAJC (8). The former two group members, including DnaJ in bacteria (4) commonly share the JD at their N-terminus (Fig. 1A), whereas the JD is present elsewhere in the DNAJC proteins (12). The N-terminal JD of the DNAJA proteins is followed by a GF-motif, two homologous β-barrel domains containing a zinc-finger-like region in the first sequence, and a C-terminal dimerization domain. The DNAJA members are also subdivided into four subfamilies, from DNAJA1 to DNAJA4. The structural components of the DNAJB group are similar to those of DNAJA, but lack the zinc-finger-like region.

Tumorous imaginal disc 1 (Tid1) was identified as a tumor suppressor that is involved in diverse cellular processes, in both the cytosol and mitochondria, that include imaginal discs differentiation, T cell development, and mitochondrial apoptosis signaling (13-16). However, as Tid1 has an N-terminal signal peptide for mitochondrial targeting (Fig. 1A), the protein localizes to the mitochondria and functions as an Hsp40 that participates in the co-chaperone activity of mortalin, the mitochondrial Hsp70 (17, 18). Mortalin and Tid1 constitute the only Hsp70/Hsp40 chaperone system in mitochondria, and in particular, the regulation of apoptosis in mitochondria is initiated by the interaction of Tid1 with mortalin via its JD.

As the domain organization of Tid1 is comparable to that of the DNAJA2-subfamily proteins, except for the presence of the N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence, Tid1 is classified as in the DNAJA3 subfamily of Hsp40 (Fig. 1A). However, whether the detailed structure and interdomain interactions, which would provide a molecular basis for substrate selectivity and Hsp70 interaction, are consistent with those of other related proteins remains to be investigated. In particular, it was recently elucidated that the interdomain interaction of JD with the GF-motif differs between the DNAJA2 and DNAJB1 subfamilies (19). Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to determine the three-dimensional structure of Tid1-JD and its interaction with the GF-motif in solution using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy.


Sequence analysis of Hsp40 proteins

A recent report by Faust et al. (18) identified that the structural mode of the interaction with Hsp70 is distinct between a DNAJA and a DNAJB Hsp40 family members, i.e., unlike in DNAJA2, the GF-motif in DNAJB1 has a C-terminal α-helix that interferes with the binding of JD to Hsp70. Meanwhile, we have previously identified an α-helix (residues 183-188) at the C-terminus of the GF-motif of Tid1 (20). Therefore, as the DNAJA3 member Tid1, whose domain organization is comparable to that of DNAJA2 (Fig. 1A), might also be close to DNAJB1, we analyzed their sequence homology in the region of JD and GF-motif (Fig. 1B). The sequence comparison of Tid1 in JD revealed 55.6% and 58.7% sequence identity with DNAJA2 and DNAJB1, respectively. Although the sequence variation in the GF-motif was significantly higher than that in the JD, the sequence identity in the GF-motif between Tid1 and DNAJB1 (26.5%) appeared to be higher than that between Tid1 and DNAJA2 (21%). Accordingly, when the sequence homology of Tid1 was analyzed, including both the JD and GF-motif, the sequence identities of Tid1 to DNAJA2 and DNAJB1 were 44% and 48%, respectively. In summary, the amino acid sequence analysis implied that the structure and functional regulation of the Tid1 JD and GF-motif might resemble those of DNAJB1, rather than those of DNAJA2. Therefore, we investigated the solution structure of Tid1 JD and its interaction with the GF-motif by NMR spectroscopy.

Solution structure of the Tid1 JD

The determined NMR structure of the Tid1 JD is shown in Fig. 2, and the structural statistics are shown in Supplementary Table 1. The root mean square deviation (RMSD) of the 20 lowest-energy structures from their average structure was 0.39 ± 0.08 Å for backbone and 0.97 ± 0.10 Å for all heavy atoms, indicating a good convergence of the ensemble structure (Fig. 2A). Overall, the structure showed a typical JD fold composed of four α-helices: α1 (residues 94-99), α2 (105-118), α3 (131-145), and α4 (149-157). The HPD motif, which is known to contain key residues for the interaction of a JD in HSP40 with its cognate Hsp70, adopted a flexible loop conformation between α2 and α3 (Fig. 2B). Although no JD structure was available for DNAJA2, the overall conformation of the Tid1 JD showed a well-matched structural superimposition on the known DNAJB1 JDGF structure (Fig. 2C), as expected from the sequence similarity (Fig. 1B). The RMSD between the JD structures of Tid1 and DNAJB1 for superposition of all Cα atom pairs in the 89-159 region of Tid1 was 2.236. Therefore, we further investigated whether the GF-motif interacts with JD in Tid1, as in DNAJB1.

Interaction between the JD and GF-motif

The 2D [1H-15N]HSQC spectrum of JD showed an overall inconsistency with that of JDGF (Fig. 3A), implying alteration of the chemical environment of the JD, probably due to direct interaction with the GF-motif. The most significantly affected residues, which were defined by weighted chemical shift perturbations (CSPs) exceeding 0.45 ppm (Fig. 3B), included Q115, K118, H121, and A139. These amino acids were located mainly on the surface of the α2, α3, and α2-α3 loop regions (Fig. 3C), which mediate the Hsp70 interaction in the JD (19). In particular, the significant CSPs at H121 and T124 suggest that the HPD motif (Fig. 2B) is likely blocked by the GF-motif interaction.

It was confirmed by comparing NMR relaxation dynamics between the JD and JDGF that the overall CSPs are not attributable to a global conformational change of JD (Fig. 4). As expected from the larger size, which increases the rotational correlation time, JDGF showed higher values of longitudinal relaxation time (T1) and lower values of transverse relaxation time (T2) than JD in individual residues. However, the overall patterns of the T1 and T2 traces along the sequence (i.e., relatively high values in helical regions) showed no significant perturbations, except for a few residues in the termini and the flexible loop regions. The hetero-[1H-15N] NOE results were also similar and in good agreement with the determined structure of the JD (i.e., consecutively high values in helical regions). This finding supports the hypothesis that the overall conformation and internal dynamics of the JD, in principle, could be maintained in JDGF. Collectively, the observed CSPs could be attributed to a rigid-body interaction between the JD and the GF-motif. In particular, the region around α5 in the GF-motif could be regarded as the JD-interacting site, as the other part (α4-α5 loop) of the GF-motif in JDGF showed high flexibility, indicated by low T1 and heteronuclear NOE values and high T2 values. The relaxation rates R1 and R2 (i.e., reciprocals of T1 and T2) of JDGF were further analyzed to determine whether α5 could accomplish a stable binding or whether it makes a dynamic or transient contact with the JD. Although the R2/R1 ratio analysis is often used as a simple approach to estimate global correlation time, it cannot distinguish, in principle, between chemical exchange and motional anisotropy (21). In contrast, the product of R1R2, which increases upon the occurrence of chemical exchange, is recognized as a more efficient parameter for estimating the μs-to-ms motional dynamics with attenuating the effect of motional anisotropy (22). As shown in Fig. 4, the average R2/R1 and R1R2 values for the residues showing heteronuclear NOE values higher than 0.7 (22) were 14.8 ± 3.3 and 14.0 ± 2.3, respectively. The smaller deviation of R1R2 (± 2.3) than that of R2/R1 (± 3.3) is likely attributed to the attenuation of motional anisotropy. For example, among the four outlier residues (Y94, T124, D181, and F190) that showed considerable (> 4.6) deviations of R2/R1, R1R2, or both, T124 could be excluded from possible candidates for chemical exchange (i.e., motional dynamics), as it showed highly attenuated R1R2 deviation despite its considerable R2/R1 deviation, indicating motional anisotropy. In contrast, the high R1R2 values of Y94 and F190, which are located at the edges of α1 and α5, respectively, could reflect their motional dynamics, and likely occur due to a general instability at the boundary regions of the helices. Likewise, a localized intrinsic fluctuation at a flexible linker region was probably due to the high R1R2 value with attenuated R2/R1 observed for D181 at the α4-α5 loop. In summary, no significant chemical exchange definable as a dynamic interaction was identified in the present analysis of the relaxation rate. In particular, given that α5 is the JD-interacting site in the GF-motif, the absence of a motional process associated with a chemical exchange in α5 indicates that the GF-motif would stably bind to the JD in Tid1.

Structural similarity of Tid1 with DNAJB1

DNAJB proteins constitute a major class of Hsp40 proteins in humans. The aforementioned research by Faust et al. identified that an autoinhibitory mode of DNAJB1—JD binding to Hsp70 is intrinsically blocked by the GF-motif, which can be released upon allosteric interaction (19). The authors also suggested that this regulatory mode, which was not present in DNAJA2, is unique to the DNAJB class, as it is essential for the specific function of DNAJB1-Hsp70 in disaggregating amyloid fibers by controlling substrate targeting. However, our present analysis of the DNAJA3 protein Tid1 indicated that its amino acid sequence is more homologous to DNAJB than DNAJA class proteins (Fig. 1B), despite its similarity to DNAJA2 in domain organization (Fig. 1A). In addition, all structural features and mutual interaction of the JD and GF-motif of Tid1 showed a close resemblance to those of DNAJB2. In particular, as the C-terminal helix of the GF-motif binds to the putative Hsp70-interacting region (i.e., α2-α3 region) of JD, as in DNAJB1, the interaction of Tid1 with Hsp70 via its JD is also expected to be blocked by the GF-motif. It remains to be further investigated whether the regulatory and functional modes of Tid1 would be comparable with those of DNAJB1. However, given that Tid1 is the only member of Hsp40 in mitochondria that interacts with the sole mitochondrial Hsp70, mortalin, we expect that the present results will contribute to catalyzing related research, to provide insight into the functional evolution of the Hsp40/Hsp70 chaperone system in mitochondria.

In the present study, we found that the solution structure of the Tid1 JD was consistent with the known JD structure of DNAJB1. In addition, as the GF-motif stably binds to JD in Tid1, as in DNAJB1, it is postulated that the JD interaction with Hsp70 is intrinsically blocked and require an allosteric interaction with Hsp70 to release that inhibition. The structural resemblance of Tid1 to DNAJB1 suggests that the mitochondrial Hsp40/Hsp70 chaperone system may have evolved to employ the specific functional mode of the major class of Hsp40 and DNAJB proteins.

Data availability statement

NMR chemical shifts have been deposited in the Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank under the following accession codes: 36474, 26322 for Tid1-JD and Tid1-JDGF, respectively. The structure of Tid1-JD has been deposited to the Protein Data Bank (PDB) under accession code 7X89.


Protein preparation

Recombinant proteins corresponding to the Tid1 JD (residues 89-159) and its extended form, JDGF (residues 89-192), which encompasses both the JD and GF-motif, were prepared for NMR, as described previously (20). Briefly, DNA fragments encoding the JD and JDGF were subcloned from the cDNA of human Tid1 into the pCold-I vector plasmids. The Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)pLysS strain transformed with the recombinant plasmids was cultured in M9 minimal media supplemented with [13C]glucose and [15N]NH4Cl, as the sole source of carbon and nitrogen, respectively. The expressed proteins carrying a hexa-histidine (H6) tag were purified via the sequential application of nickel affinity and anion-exchange chromatography. The purified proteins were treated with protease factor-Xa for H6 tag removal, followed by final purification via gel-permeation chromatography.

NMR measurement

The isotope [13C/15N]-enriched protein samples for NMR were dissolved in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 7 % (v/v) D2O. Two-dimensional HSQC spectra and three-dimensional (3D) NMR data were recorded at 25°C on a Bruker 800 or 900 MHz NMR spectrometer equipped with a cryoprobe. The measured NMR spectra were processed using the NMRPipe/NMRDraw software (23) and analyzed with the NMRView program (24). Based on the previously achieved backbone NMR assignments (20), the side-chain assignments of the JD were performed using 3D HBHA(CO)NH, HCCH-COSY, and 15N-HCCH-TOCSY spectra. The combined chemical shift perturbations were represented by [(ΔδNH2 + ΔδN2/25)/2]1/2, where ΔδNH and ΔδN are the chemical shift changes of backbone amide proton (NH) and amide (N), respectively.

Structural determination

Distance restraints for structure calculation were obtained from 3D [15N]- and [13C]-edited NOESY-HSQC NMR spectra, of which NOE cross-peaks were assigned by the auto-assignment function of CYANA 2.1 (25). Dihedral ϕ and φ angle restraints were derived from the prediction of TALOS+ (26) using the previously assigned backbone NMR chemical shifts (20). Initial structures of the Tid1 JD were generated with CYANA 2.1, followed by refinements with the statistical torsion angle potential energy functions (27) using the Charmm program (28). The final 20 structures with the lowest energy were validated by three types of scores:: DOPE (29), normalized DOPE, and dDFIRE (30). Ramachandran plot appearance was measured using MolProbity (31).

Relaxation analysis

The longitudinal relaxation rate (R1) and the transverse relaxation rate (R2) of backbone 15N nuclei, as well as the heteronuclear NOEs between amide 15N and 1H nuclei were assessed using established HSQC-based NMR pulse sequences. Relaxation experiments were performed at 900 MHz (21.2 Tesla). T1 values were measured from 1H-15N correlation spectra recorded with relaxation evolution delays of 50, 100, 200, 300, 500, 700, 900, and 1200 ms. A 3 s delay was used between scans. T2 values were measured from 1H-15N correlation spectra recorded using relaxation evolution delays of 16.96, 33.92, 67.84, 101.76, 135.68, 169.6, 203.52, and 254.4 ms. A delay of 2 s was used between scans. The steady-state 1H-15N heteronuclear NOE values were determined from the peak ratios observed between the two spectra, which were collected with or without pre-saturation of the proton dimension. A delay of 3 s was used between the scans.


This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2017R1A5A2015541, 2019R1F1A1057427 and 2019R1A2C1004883) and by ”Regional Inovation Strategy (RIS)“ through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) (2021RIS-001). The use of NMR was supported by the Korea Basic Science Institute under the R&D program (Project No. C140440), supervised by the Ministry of Science and ICT.


The authors have no conflicting interests.

Fig. 1. Sequence analysis of Tid1. (A) Schematic diagram for comparison of domain organization in DNAJA2, DNAJA3 (Tid1), and DNAJB1 subfamily of Hsp40: JD, J-domain; GF, G/F-rich region; Zn, zinc-finger-like region; CTD-I, C-terminal domain I; CTD-II, C-terminal domain II; DD, dimerization domain. (B) Pairwise sequence alignment of human DNAJA3 (Tid1) with DNAJA2 and DNAJB1 in the region encompassing JD and GF-motif.
Fig. 2. Solution structure of Tid1 JD. (A) Stereo representation of ensemble structure showing superposition of backbone traces for the 20 lowest-energy conformers determined by NMR. (B) Ribbon representation of the lowest-energy structure. Sidechains are presented by stick models and labeled for the HPD motif. (C) Structural comparison between the Tid1 JD (sky blue) and the DNAJB1 JDGF (gray; PDB accession code 6z5n).
Fig. 3. Identification of GF-motif-interacting region in JD. (A) Comparison of 2D [1H-15N]HSQC NMR spectrum between JD (red) and JDGF (black). (B) Chemical shift perturbation (CSP) in JD region caused by the GF-motif interaction. The most significantly (> 0.45) perturbed chemical shifts are indicated in red. (C) Mapping of the GF-motif-interaction site on the surface of the JD structure. The GF-motif- and Hsp70-interacting regions are indicated by dotted circles in blue and red, respectively. CSP values are coordinated from white to red colors. Asterisks indicate the residues for which CSPs were not available due to missing assignments.
Fig. 4. NMR relaxation dynamics of Tid1 JD and JDGF. Red and black circles in the T1, T2, and heteronuclar NOE analysis indicate the values for JD and JDGF, respectively. The R1R2 (black) and R2/R1 (red) values are for JDGF. Mean values of R1R2 (14.0) and R2/R1 (14.8) are indicated by dashed lines in black and red, respectively.
  1. Jo KS, Kim JH, Ryu KS et al (2019) Unique unfoldase/aggregase activity of a molecular chaperone Hsp33 in its holding-inactive state. J Mol Biol 431, 1468-1480
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Keum M, Ito D, Kim MS et al (2021) Molecular effects of elongation factor Ts and trigger factor on the unfolding and aggregation of elongation factor Tu induced by the prokaryotic molecular chaperone Hsp33. Biology (Basel) 10, 1171
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Kim MJ, Kim J, Im JS, Kang I and Ahn JK (2021) Hepatitis B virus X protein enhances liver cancer cell migration by regulating calmodulin-associated actin polymerization. BMB Rep 54, 614-619
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Yochem J, Uchida H, Sunshine M, Saito H, Georgopoulos CP and Feiss M (1978) Genetic analysis of two genes, dnaJ and dnaK, necessary for Escherichia coli and bacteriophage lambda DNA replication. Mol Gen Genet 164, 9-14
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Kampinga HH and Craig EA (2010) The HSP70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11, 579-592
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Mayer MP and Bukau B (2005) Hsp70 chaperones: cellular functions and molecular mechanism. Cell Mol Life Sci 62, 670-684
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Rosenzweig R, Nillegoda NB, Mayer MP and Bukau B (2019) The Hsp70 chaperone network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 20, 665-680
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Cheetham ME and Caplan AJ (1998) Structure, function and evolution of DnaJ: conservation and adaptation of chaperone function. Cell stress & chaperones 3, 28-36
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Craig EA and Marszalek J (2017) How do J-proteins get Hsp70 to do so many different things?. Trends Biochem Sci 42, 355-368
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Cyr DM, Langer T and Douglas MG (1994) DnaJ-like proteins: molecular chaperones and specific regulators of Hsp70. Trends Biochem Sci 19, 176-181
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Kelley WL (1998) The J-domain family and the recruitment of chaperone power. Trends Biochem Sci 23, 222-227
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Perrody E, Cirinesi AM, Desplats C et al (2012) A bacteriophage-encoded J-domain protein interacts with the DnaK/Hsp70 chaperone and stabilizes the heat-shock factor sigma32 of Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet 8, e1003037
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Ahn BY, Trinh DL, Zajchowski LD, Lee B, Elwi AN and Kim SW (2010) Tid1 is a new regulator of p53 mitochondrial translocation and apoptosis in cancer. Oncogene 29, 1155-1166
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Proft J, Faraji J, Robbins JC et al (2011) Identification of bilateral changes in TID1 expression in the 6-OHDA rat model of Parkinson's disease. PloS one 6, e26045
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Trinh DL, Elwi AN and Kim SW (2010) Direct interaction between p53 and Tid1 proteins affects p53 mitochondrial localization and apoptosis. Oncotarget 1, 396-404
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. Zhou C, Taslima F, Abdelhamid M et al (2020) Beta-Amyloid increases the expression levels of Tid1 responsible for neuronal cell death and amyloid beta production. Mol Neurobiol 57, 1099-1114
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Wang SF, Huang KH, Tseng WC et al (2020) DNAJA3/Tid1 is required for mitochondrial dna maintenance and regulates migration and invasion of human gastric cancer cells. Cancers 12 Basel, 3463
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Syken J, De-Medina T and Munger K (1999) TID1, a human homolog of the Drosophila tumor suppressor l(2)tid, encodes two mitochondrial modulators of apoptosis with opposing functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96, 8499-8504
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Faust O, Abayev-Avraham M, Wentink AS et al (2020) HSP40 proteins use class-specific regulation to drive HSP70 functional diversity. Nature 587, 489-494
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Jo KS, Sim DW, Kim EH et al (2018) Backbone NMR assignments of a putative p53-binding domain of the mitochondrial Hsp40, Tid1. J Kor Magn Reson Soc 22, 64-70
  21. Kay LE, Torchia DA and Bax A (1989) Backbone dynamics of proteins as studied by 15N inverse detected heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy: application to staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry 28, 8972-8979
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Kneller JM, Lu M and Bracken C (2002) An effective method for the discrimination of motional anisotropy and chemical exchange. J Am Chem Soc 124, 1852-1853
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J and Bax A (1995) NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR 6, 277-293
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Johnson BA (2004) Using NMRView to visualize and analyze the NMR spectra of macromolecules. Methods Mol Biol 278, 313-352
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Guntert P (2004) Automated NMR structure calculation with CYANA. Methods Mol Biol 278, 353-378
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Shen Y, Delaglio F, Cornilescu G and Bax A (2009) TALOS+: a hybrid method for predicting protein backbone torsion angles from NMR chemical shifts. J Biomol NMR 44, 213-223
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  27. Kim TR, Yang JS, Shin S and Lee J (2013) Statistical torsion angle potential energy functions for protein structure modeling: a bicubic interpolation approach. Proteins 81, 1156-1165
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Brooks BR, Brooks CL 3rd, Mackerell AD Jr et al (2009) CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 30, 1545-1614
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  29. Shen MY and Sali A (2006) Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci 15, 2507-2524
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Zhou H and Skolnick J (2009) Protein structure prediction by pro-Sp3-TASSER. Biophys J 96, 2119-2127
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Williams CJ, Headd JJ, Moriarty NW et al (2018) MolProbity: more and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci 27, 293-315
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef

This Article

Cited By Articles

Author ORCID Information

Funding Information
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
      NRF-2017R1A5A2015541, 2019R1F1A1057427, 2019R1A2C1004883, 2021RIS-001
  • Ministry of Education
      NRF-2017R1A5A2015541, 2019R1F1A1057427, 2019R1A2C1004883, 2021RIS-001
  • Korea Basic Science Institute


Social Network Service