BMB Reports 2020; 53(6): 291-298  https://doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2020.53.6.060
Angiogenesis and vasculogenic mimicry as therapeutic targets in ovarian cancer
Dansaem Lim1, Yeojin Do1, Byung Su Kwon3, Woochul Chang4, Myeong-Sok Lee1,2, Jongmin Kim1,2,* & Jin Gu Cho1,2,*
1Division of Biological Sciences, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, 2Research Institute for Women’s Health, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan 49241, 4Department of Biology Education, College of Education, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea
Correspondence to: Jin Gu Cho, Tel: +82-2-710-9553; Fax: +82-2-2077-7322; E-mail: jgcho84@gmail.com; Jongmin Kim, Tel: +82-2-710-9553; Fax: +82-2-2077-7322; E-mail: jkim@sookmyung.ac.kr
Received: March 20, 2020; Published online: June 30, 2020.
© Korean Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. All rights reserved.

cc This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ABSTRACT
Tumor angiogenesis is an essential process for growth and metastasis of cancer cells as it supplies tumors with oxygen and nutrients. During tumor angiogenesis, many pro-angiogenic factors are secreted by tumor cells to induce their own vascularization via activation of pre-existing host endothelium. However, accumulating evidence suggests that vasculogenic mimicry (VM) is a key alternative mechanism for tumor vascularization when tumors are faced with insufficient supply of oxygen and nutrients. VM is a tumor vascularization mechanism in which tumors create a blood supply system, in contrast to tumor angiogenesis mechanisms that depend on pre-existing host endothelium. VM is closely associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis in many cancers. Therefore, inhibition of VM may be a promising therapeutic strategy and may overcome the limitations of anti-angiogenesis therapy for cancer patients. In this review, we provide an overview of the current anti-angiogenic therapies for ovarian cancer and the current state of knowledge regarding the links between microRNAs and the VM process, with a focus on the mechanism that regulates associated signaling pathways in ovarian cancer. Moreover, we discuss the potential for VM as a therapeutic strategy against ovarian cancer.
Keywords: Angiogenesis, Ovarian cancer, Therapeutic target, Tumor vascularization, Vasculogenic mimicry
INTRODUCTION

Gynecologic cancers that occur in female reproductive organs include ovarian cancer, uterine cancer, vaginal cancer, cervical cancer, and vulvar cancer. According to data released in 2019, ovarian cancer has the highest incidence and mortality rate among gynecologic cancers (1, 2). The standard treatments for ovarian cancer patients are carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy, which are effective in 80% of patients. However, almost all patients develop tumor recurrence and chemotherapy resistance (3). Furthermore, due to chemotherapy resistance, the 5-year survival rate for ovarian cancer patients is less than 45% (4). Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches are required to improve outcomes for ovarian cancer patients. Angiogenesis refers to the formation of new blood vessels from pre-existing endothelium, a physiological process that is vital for tissue repair and development (5, 6). In pathological states such as cancer, angiogenesis is a fundamental process that supplies tumors with oxygen and nutrition required for their growth and survival (Fig. 1). In addition, angiogenesis is an essential component of the metastatic cascade (5, 6). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR) are major drivers of tumor angiogenesis. Inhibitors of VEGF and VEGFR are widely used for the treatment of solid tumors (7). Although angiogenesis-targeting therapies have shown promising clinical results in solid tumors, these therapies have shown only modest improvements in overall survival (8). In addition, it has been demonstrated that anti-angiogenic therapy results in worse clinical outcomes in patients who develop resistance to anti-angiogenic drugs, suggesting that the possible mechanism behind anti-angiogenic drug resistance may be the activation of alternative pathways of tumor neovascularization (8, 9).

Figure 1. Schematic representation of differences between angiogenesis and VM. During tumor angiogenesis, tumor cells secrete many pro-angiogenic factors to induce their vascularization via activation of pre-existing host endothelium, whereas VM is a tumor vascularization mechanism in which tumors create a blood supply system when faced with an insufficient supply of oxygen and nutrients.

Maniotis et al. observed tumor angiogenesis-independent vascular channels in highly aggressive uveal melanomas and termed the phenomenon vasculogenic mimicry (VM) (10). Since then, VM has been observed in many aggressive tumor types such as ovarian cancer, breast cancer, and glioma (11-13). VM is the formation of a nutrient and oxygen supply system by tumor cell-lined vessels, suggesting alternative pathways of tumor neovascularization (Fig. 1). Tumor cells associated with VM express markers associated with endothelial cells, the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and cancer stem cells (CSCs) and contribute to the formation of the tumor vasculature (11).

EMT is a reversible phenotypic switching process by which epithelial cells lose their traits and acquire mesenchymal characteristics. Accumulating evidence suggests that activation of EMT not only triggers cancer cell invasion and metastasis, but also contributes to VM (14). CSCs are closely involved in recurrence and metastasis in various cancer cells and VM. It has been shown that cells positive for CSC markers such as CD133 and aldehyde dehydrogenase1 (ALDH1) play a key role in VM in various cancer cell types (15-18). VM is associated with advanced disease at presentation and an extremely poor prognosis in ovarian cancer (12, 16). Furthermore, it was shown that anti-angiogenic therapy induces a hypoxic response and VM in ovarian cancer, suggesting that VM may serve as an alternative tumor neovascularization (19). In light of this evidence, further studies are urgently needed to understand the molecular mechanisms associated with VM in order to overcome the limitations of anti-angiogenic therapy and to develop novel therapeutics that target multiple cancers. In this review, we summarize the available knowledge regarding current anti-angiogenic therapies and the mechanisms involved in VM in ovarian cancer. Moreover, we discuss potential therapeutic strategies involving the regulation of VM in ovarian cancer.

ANTI-ANGIOGENIC THERAPY IN OVARIAN CANCER

Angiogenesis is a dynamic process that is essential for embryonic development, wound healing, and ovulation under physiological conditions and is tightly controlled by a balance between angiogenic stimuli and angiogenic inhibitors (5, 20). However, disruption of the balance between angiogenic and anti-angiogenic molecules can lead to pathological conditions such as cancer, diabetic microvascular complications, and inflammatory disorders (5, 20). Of known pro-angiogenic factors, the most well-known are members of the VEGF family such as VEGF-A, VEGF-B, VEGF-C, and VEGF-D. VEGF proteins promote angiogenesis by binding to VEGFR and subsequently activating signaling cascades (7). In addition, many studies have shown that VEGF signaling is highly activated in ovarian cancer where it is closely associated with tumor grade and poor prognosis (21-23). Thus, blocking pro-angiogenic signaling, such as VEGF signaling, may be an effective therapeutic option against ovarian cancer. Therapeutics that involve targeting anti-angiogenic drugs through VEGF/VEGFR signaling are summarized below.

VEGF-A targeting agent: Bevacizumab

Bevacizumab is the first recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against VEGF-A to be recognized as an anti-angiogenic agent. Bevacizumab inhibits VEGF-A from binding to VEGFR. Bevacizumab is approved by the FDA for use in the treatment and maintenance of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Bevacizumab, a representative molecular target drug, has proven clinical efficacy in the treatment of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer whereby it blocks the development of new blood vessels in tumors, destroys existing blood vessels and reduces intratumoral pressure (24, 25). Use of bevacizumab by ovarian cancer patients delays tumor progression and is applied as a maintenance therapy against ovarian cancer. Recently, bevacizumab and chemotherapy have been combined for use in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (26). However, bevacizumab has been shown to improve median progression-free survival (PFS) for 2-4 months (27). Thus, it is necessary to identify predictive biomarkers to enable achieving greater therapeutic responses to bevacizumab only or in combination with VM inhibitors to enhance the clinical outcomes of anti-angiogenic therapy in ovarian cancer patients.

VEGFR targeting agents: Cediranib, pazopanib, nintedanib

Cediranib is an inhibitor of VEGFR (VEGFR1-3) tyrosine kinase which has been shown to have disappointing efficacy in many cancers and increased toxicity such as diarrhea, neutropenia, hypertension, and voice changes (27, 28). Nevertheless, cediranib treatment of ovarian cancer patients is promising, and significant improvements in progression-free survival have been identified in Phase 3 trials with chemotherapy and maintenance treatment (29, 30).

Pazopanib is a selective multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits VEGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), c-KIT, c-Fms, and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), and tumor growth and angiogenesis (31, 32). Pazopanib also has side effects, such as neutropenia, fatigue, leucopenia, hypertension, and anemia (33). However, it has advantages in platinum-resistant and refractory treatment and platinum-sensitive maintenance in ovarian cancer (34, 35).

Nintedanib competitively inhibits non-receptor tyrosine kinases such as lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (Lck), tyrosine-protein kinase Lyn (Lyn), proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src (Src), and receptor tyrosine kinases such as PDGFR, FGFR, FLT3, and VEGFR (27). Nintedanib is used in a variety of diseases, sometimes in combination with other drugs for the treatment of some cancers (36). Nintedanib has common side effects including abdominal pain, vomiting, and diarrhea (37). However, Phase 3 trials have shown that treatments combining nintedanib with carboplatin and paclitaxel produce remarkable therapeutic effects in ovarian cancer patients. However, these positive effects were accompanied by serious side effects including adverse gastrointestinal events (38).

Angiogenesis inhibitors that do not target VEGF signaling are also used as ovarian cancer therapeutics. Angiopoietin 1 and 2 (Ang1/2) bind to the Tie-2 receptor and stimulate proliferation, motility, and survival in endothelial cells. Trebananib is a non-VEGF-dependent angiogenesis pathway inhibitor that binds to Ang 1/2 and inhibits its action on the Tie-2 receptor, thus inhibiting angiogenesis. Trebananib-based therapies have produced meaningful effects in terms of progression-free survival when combined with paclitaxel in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (39).

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF VM IN OVARIAN CANCER

Anti-angiogenic therapy has some advantages over chemotherapy because it does not directly kill cancer cells but rather stops the formation of new blood vessels that rarely occur in tissues other than tumors. Therefore, it is well-tolerated by patients and is associated with fewer side effects. Unfortunately, the use of anti-angiogenic therapies results in a hypoxic tumor microenvironment and the development of resistance by alternative tumor vascularization (40). Understanding the mechanisms and signaling pathways involved in VM is expected to enable overcoming the limitations of anti-angiogenic therapies.

VM is a tumor cell-derived vascular network and a functional micro-circulation system that provides oxygen and nutrients to tumors independent of angiogenesis, which contributes to tumor growth and metastasis (9, 41). The first evidence of clinical significance of VM in ovarian cancer showed that VM was closely associated with shorter overall survival and aggressive tumor features (12). Since then, Yu et al. demonstrated that VM was significantly associated with tumor grade, tumor/lymph node/metastasis and advanced stage. Moreover, VM-positive ovarian cancer patients had significantly shorter overall survival compared with VM-negative ovarian cancer patients, suggesting that VM plays a crucial role in tumor progression and metastasis in ovarian cancer (15). Given that CSCs are involved in VM, it has been shown that a combination of markers of VM and the CSC marker CD133 was associated with advanced tumor stage, non-response to chemotherapy, and shorter overall survival time in ovarian cancer (16). Although VM is considered an alternative tumor vascularization mechanism for tumor invasion and metastasis and has been shown to be associated with poor clinical prognosis in ovarian cancer, few studies have assessed the molecular mechanisms associated with VM in ovarian cancer. Our efforts to understand the mechanism of VM in ovarian cancer may provide new insights to enable identifying novel therapeutic targets. The following sections will outline the current understanding of the molecular mechanisms associated with VM and will discuss the possibility of employing VM-targeted therapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

MAJOR MECHANISMS OF VM IN OVARIAN CANCER

Both tumor angiogenesis and VM are critical for tumor blood supply and play an essential role in the progression of tumor growth and metastasis. However, although signaling pathways governing tumor angiogenesis have been extensively studied (5, 7, 20, 42, 43), signaling pathways associated with VM in ovarian cancer remain poorly understood. Nevertheless, owing to the importance of VM in cancer biology, the molecular mechanisms underlying VM have been gradually investigated in ovarian cancer. Given that VM occurs due to the ability of tumor cells to trans-differentiate into vascular endothelial-like phenotypes, the signaling pathways associated with vascular/angiogenesis and hypoxia-related signaling pathways have been investigated (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Signaling pathways implicated in tumor cell VM. This figure summarizes the signaling pathways involved in the regulation of VM of ovarian cancer. Red solid bars denote VM inhibiting the signaling pathways, Black solid arrows denote VM promoting the signaling pathways.

Vascular/angiogenesis signaling in VM

Hendrix et al. investigated the biological significance of several endothelial cell markers such as CD31, Tie-1/2, and vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin in VM, with the hypothesis that upregulation of endothelial cell markers in aggressive tumor cells may result in their ability to form VM. It was found that VE-cadherin was exclusively upregulated in highly aggressive melanoma cells, and knockdown of VE-cadherin led to inhibition of VM in aggressive melanoma cells, indicating an essential role for VE-cadherin in VM in melanoma cells (44). It has been demonstrated that VE-cadherin is involved in VM in ovarian cancer. VE-cadherin expression was highly upregulated in VM-positive patients and in SKOV3 and OVCAR3 ovarian cancer cells under hypoxic conditions (45). It has also been shown that VE-cadherin expression levels are closely associated with the propensity for VM in ovarian cancer cells and malignant ovarian cancer tissues (46, 47), suggesting biological significance of VE-cadherin in VM in malignant ovarian cancers.

VEGF is one of the most potent pro-angiogenic factors that play a key role in both physiological and pathological angiogenesis (48, 49). Several studies have identified potential roles of VEGF in VM in various cancer types (23,50-52); however, the role of VEGF in VM remains controversial. The first study examining the role of VEGF-A in VM in ovarian cancer showed that VEGF-A promotes VM in vitro, and the expression of VEGF-A in VM-positive ovarian tumor tissues was higher than that in VM-negative ovarian tumor tissues. Mechanistic investigations revealed that VEGF-A stimulation induces the expression of EphA2, which is necessary for VEGF-induced neovascularization (23, 53), and knockdown of EphA2 inhibits VEGF-A-induced VM in ovarian cancer cells (23), suggesting that EphA2 plays a key role in VEGF-A-induced VM in ovarian cancer. Additionally, VEGF-A treatment markedly increased the activity of MMP9, and EphA2 knockdown resulting in decreased activity of MMP9 and MMP2 in SKOV3 and OVCAR3 ovarian cancer cells, respectively. These findings suggest that the VEGF-A/EphA2/MMP9 and MMP2 signaling axis plays an important role in the process of VM in ovarian cancer (23). Consistent with this report, VEGF and semaphorin4D (SEMA4D) expression levels were significantly higher in ovarian cancer tissues than in normal ovarian tissue, and the expression of VEGF positively correlated with the expression of SEMA4D in ovarian cancer tissues. Moreover, VEGF and SEMA4D showed synergistic effects on VM in the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780, and knockdown of VEGF and SEMA4D decreased the expression of VM-related molecues such as MMP2 and VE-cadherin in ovarian cancer cells (22). Conversely, another study showed that short-term bevacizumab treatment resulted in increased metastasis and induced VM in mice receiving short-term bevacizumab treatment, suggesting that VM may be an alternative mechanism underlying tumor resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy (19). The controversy surrounding the role of VEGF in the regulation of VM might reflect tumor cell type differences and tumor cell heterogeneity. Therefore, further studies are needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms associated with VEGF-driven VM and VEGF-independent VM.

Hypoxia signaling in VM

Tumor hypoxia arises due to rapid proliferation of cancer cells and dysfunctional tumor vasculature, resulting in rapid exhaustion of oxygen and nutrients. Tumor hypoxia is one of the most important features of the solid tumor microenvironment, playing a pivotal role in cancer development, malignancy, and progression (54). Under hypoxic conditions, hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) is the key transcription factor that binds to the hypoxia response element (HRE) to regulate the expression of hypoxia-related molecues such as VEGF and EPO (55, 56), which allow tumor cells to adapt to a hostile microenvironment. Accumulating evidence suggests that tumor hypoxia plays a key role in cancer cell plasticity and is functionally essential for VM (45, 57, 58). Potential hypoxia target molecues containing functional HREs such as VE-cadherin, VEGF-A, VEGFR-1, EphA2, and Twist influence VM (57). Initial investigation into the involvement of HIF-1 in VM in ovarian cancer showed that the HIF-1a inhibitor rapamycin inhibits VM by suppressing CD31 and Factor VIII, suggesting the involvement of HIF-1a in VM in ovarian cancer (59). Additionally, another study investigated the effects of hypoxia on VM and its underlying molecular mechanism(s) in ovarian cancer. HIF-1a expression was correlated with expression of EMT markers such as vimentin, Twist1, and Slug as well as shorter survival in patients with VM-positive ovarian cancer. Under hypoxic conditions, ovarian cancer cells showed greater VM by inducing EMT. These findings indicate that EMT is important for hypoxia-induced VM in ovarian cancer (45). Hypoxia plays a key role in VM in ovarian cancer cells, and human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) is a placental hormone that regulates placental angiogenesis during pregnancy which is ectopically expressed in many malignant tumors (60, 61). Su et al. investigated the involvement of HCG in VM in OVCAR3 ovarian cancer cells under hypoxic conditions. It was shown that hypoxia induced VM via upregulation of HCG expression, an effect that was abolished by knockdown of HIF-1a. In addition, HCG treatment led to significant VM and endothelial cell marker expression, even under normoxic conditions (62). By further exploring the role of HCG in VM in ovarian cancer in vivo, researchers showed that injection of OVCAR3 ovarian cancer cells overexpressing chorionic gonadotropin beta polypeptide 5 (CGB5) induced xenograft tumor formation and VM via upregulation of endothelial markers such as CD31, VEGF, and factor VIII (63). Considering a number of studies underscore the importance of hypoxia in VM for a variety of cancers, clarifying the underlying mechanisms associated with hypoxia-induced VM and establishing strategies to regulate VM are urgently needed.

Other important factors in VM

It has been reported that other genes are also involved in VM in ovarian cancer. X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis-associated factor 1 (XAF1) plays a key role in the regulation of apoptosis and angiogenic properties of endothelial cells and cancer cells (64, 65). Given that angiogenesis and apoptosis signaling are involved in VM (53, 66), Wang et al. investigated the potential role of XAF1 in VM in ovarian cancer and found that XAF1 expression was downregulated in the VM-positive group which was associated with high-grade advanced ovarian cancer. Overexpression of XAF1 decreased VEGF expression and inhibited the motility of SKOV3 ovarian cancer cells. An inhibitory role for XAF1 in relation to VM and VEGF expression was also shown in xenograft models, suggesting that XAF1 acts as a negative regulator of VM via VEGF inhibition (67).

Another regulator of VM is the Wnt family of proteins, which are key regulators of tumorigenesis, endothelial differentiation, and vascular development. The Wnt signaling pathway includes the β-Catenin-dependent (canonical) and -independent (non-canonical) pathways. Wnt5a, a member of the non-canonical Wnt family, is essential for cancer initiation and progression (68, 69). Qi et al. investigated the association between Wnt5a and VM in ovarian cancer and demonstrated that the expression of Wnt5a is significantly correlated with VM and protein kinase Ca (PKCa) expression, suggesting that it may act as a downstream factor of non-canonical Wnt5a signaling. An in vitro mechanistic investigation showed that Wnt5a induces VM and regulates the expression of EMT-related markers such as vimentin and E-cadherin in ovarian cancer cells. Additionally, it was shown that Wnt5a-induced EMT and VM are mediated by the PKCa pathway in ovarian cancer cells (70).

Decomposition of the extracellular matrix (ECM) is an important process in EMT-induced VM. It has been shown that urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) regulates tumor angiogenesis by degrading ECM molecules such as laminin, fibronectin, and collagen (71). Tang et al. investigated the association between uPA and VM in ovarian cancer. VM occurrence was positively correlated with high uPA expression in 90 ovarian cancer cases and ovarian cancer cells, and uPA knockdown led to a decrease in VM via regulation of the AKT/mTOR/MMP2/Laminin5g2 signaling pathway in ovarian cancer cells. In addition, it was found that cyclin RGD (cRGD) inhibited VM in ovarian cancer cells via downregulation of uPA expression and EMT repression (72). These findings suggest that modulation of uPA expression may be a potential therapeutic target for VM in ovarian cancer.

Given that activation of endothelin-1 (ET-1)/endothelin A receptor (ETAR) and ET-1/ETBR signaling is closely associated with tumor growth, angiogenesis, metastasis, and chemoresistance, Sestito et al. investigated the role of ET-1 signaling in VM in ovarian cancer. It was demonstrated that the dual ETAR/ETBR antagonist macitentan significantly inhibited VM, and enabled inhibition of ET-1-induced activation of AKT and MAPK signaling pathways in cisplatin resistant A2780 and 2008 cells (73). Thus, macitentan could be a novel potential drug for ovarian cancer therapy, due to its ability to inhibit VM.

A recent study showed that syndecan-1 (SDC1) and tumor angiogenic-associated B-fibronectin isoform (B-FN) play a pivotal role in VM in ovarian cancer. Combined treatment with L19-IL2 (an immunocytokine specific for B-FN) and an anti-SDC1 46F2SIP (small immunoprotein) antibody was effective in reducing the expression of EMT markers and loss of cancer stemness traits, which were correlated with inhibition of VM in mice (74).

MicroRNAs in VM

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are 21-25 nucleotides small non-coding RNAs which regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally. They recognize the 3’-untranslated region (3’-UTR) of the target mRNA to promote degradation of the mRNA or to inhibit protein synthesis, thus reducing the expression of the target gene (75). Many studies have shown that miRNA expression is dysregulated in various diseases (76-78). Several studies have demonstrated that miRNAs play an important role in the regulation of VM in ovarian cancer (46,79-81).

The miR-200 family (miR-141, miR-200a, miR-200b, miR-200c, and miR-429) is known to target transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), a potent inducer of EMT, and EMT-related transcription factors Zinc Finger E-Box Binding Homeobox (ZEB)-1 and ZEB-2, resulting in the inhibition of ovarian cancer invasion, migration, metastasis, and EMT (82). Given the inhibitory effect of the miR-200 family on the EMT process, Sun et al. investigated the role of miR-200a in VM in ovarian cancer. Expression of miR-200a was downregulated in VM-positive ovarian cancer, which is associated with high tumor grade/stage, and metastasis. A mechanistic study revealed that miR-200a inhibits VM by directly targeting EphA2, a key regulator of VM in ovarian cancer. These findings suggest that miR-200a-mediated EphA2 regulation plays important roles in the progression and prognosis of ovarian cancer patients (79).

As described above, VE-cadherin is highly overexpressed in VM-forming cancer cells and plays an essential role in VM in malignant ovarian cancer (45). Therefore, VE-cadherin-targeting miRNAs could be excellent targets for the control of VM in ovarian cancer. miR-27b plays an important role in the regulation of VM in ovarian cancer by directly targeting VE-cadherin. Low levels of miR-27b expression are strongly correlated with high levels of VE-cadherin expression and robust VM in ovarian cancer cells. It was demonstrated that miR-27b directly targets the 3’-UTR of VE-cadherin, and overexpression of miR-27b inhibits VM, migration, and invasion in ovarian cancer cells. Additionally, it was shown that miR-27b suppresses ovarian cancer-associated VM in vivo using a matrigel plug assay (46).

In another study, the authors investigated the relevance of hypoxia-responsive miRNAs to VM in SKOV3 ovarian cancer cells. It was shown that miR-765 was markedly downregulated under hypoxic conditions, and ectopic restoration of miR-765 significantly inhibited VM without affecting cell viability. Interestingly, it was identified that miR-765 directly targets VEGF, another key regulator in VM in ovarian cancer cells (80). Although our current understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying VM in ovarian cancer is advancing, future studies are needed to fully understand the molecular mechanism(s) associated with VM in ovarian cancer. In particular, it has been demonstrated that CSCs are involved in VM in many cancers. Therefore, it will be important to determine the molecular mechanisms associated with VM in the context of ovarian CSCs in future studies. Fig. 2 shows a summary of the major signaling mechanisms involved in the regulation of VM in ovarian cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common forms of gynecologic cancer with an extremely high morbidity and mortality rate. Although initial responses to platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy are generally good, the recurrence rate is extremely high (∼80%). Several studies show that anti-angiogenic therapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy is a promising therapeutic strategy for ovarian cancer. However, curative rates of anti-angiogenic therapy are not increased in most ovarian cancer patients (83), and anti-angiogenic therapy with bevacizumab induces a hypoxic response and VM (19), which may be associated with limited efficacy and poor therapeutic response to anti-angiogenic therapy in ovarian cancer. In addition, accumulating evidence suggests that VM is closely associated with poor prognosis, high metastatic potential, and shorter survival in cancer patients. Therefore, as an alternative tumor vascularization mechanism, VM targeting may represent a promising treatment option for ovarian cancer patients to enhance the clinical outcomes of anti-angiogenic therapy. In addition, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in VM will facilitate overcoming disad vantages associated with current ovarian cancer therapeutics.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the minister of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2016R1A5A1011974 and NRF-2019R1A2C4069815 to J.K., 2017R1D1A1B03034206 to J.G.C).

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicting interests.

REFERENCES
  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD and Jemal A (2019) Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 69, 7-34
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Sudo T (2012) Molecular-targeted therapies for ovarian cancer: prospects for the future. Int J Clin Oncol 17, 424-429
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Hennessy BT, Coleman RL and Markman M (2009) Ovarian cancer. Lancet 374, 1371-1382
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Webb PM and Jordan SJ (2017) Epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 41, 3-14
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Park JA and Kwon YG (2018) Hippo-YAP/TAZ signaling in angiogenesis. BMB Rep 51, 157-162
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Folkman J (2002) Role of angiogenesis in tumor growth and metastasis. Semin Oncol 29, 15-18
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Shibuya M (2008) Vascular endothelial growth factor-dependent and -independent regulation of angiogenesis. BMB Rep 41, 278-286
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Ribatti D, Annese T, Ruggieri S, Tamma R and Crivellato E (2019) Limitations of Anti-Angiogenic Treatment of Tumors. Transl Oncol 12, 981-986
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Dunleavey JM and Dudley AC (2012) Vascular Mimicry: Concepts and Implications for Anti-Angiogenic Therapy. Curr Angiogenes 1, 133-138
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Maniotis AJ, Folberg R, Hess A et al (1999) Vascular channel formation by human melanoma cells in vivo and in vitro: vasculogenic mimicry. Am J Pathol 155, 739-752
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Zhang X, Zhang J, Zhou H, Fan G and Li Q (2019) Molecular Mechanisms and Anticancer Therapeutic Strategies in Vasculogenic Mimicry. J Cancer 10, 6327-6340
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  12. Sood AK, Fletcher MS, Zahn CM et al (2002) The clinical significance of tumor cell-lined vasculature in ovarian carcinoma: implications for anti-vasculogenic therapy. Cancer Biol Ther 1, 661-664
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Park Y and Kim J (2019) Regulation of IL-6 signaling by miR-125a and let-7e in endothelial cells controls vasculogenic mimicry formation of breast cancer cells. BMB Rep 52, 214-219
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Fan YL, Zheng M, Tang YL and Liang XH (2013) A new perspective of vasculogenic mimicry: EMT and cancer stem cells (Review). Oncol Lett 6, 1174-1180
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Yu L, Zhu B, Wu S et al (2017) Evaluation of the correlation of vasculogenic mimicry, ALDH1, KiSS-1, and MACC1 in the prediction of metastasis and prognosis in ovarian carcinoma. Diagn Pathol 12, 23
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. Liang J, Yang B, Cao Q and Wu X (2016) Association of Vasculogenic Mimicry Formation and CD133 Expression with Poor Prognosis in Ovarian Cancer. Gynecol Obstet Invest 81, 529-536
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Chae YC and Kim JH (2018) Cancer stem cell metabolism: target for cancer therapy. BMB Rep 51, 319-326
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Zhang D, Sun B, Zhao X et al (2014) Twist1 expression induced by sunitinib accelerates tumor cell vasculogenic mimicry by increasing the population of CD133+ cells in triple-negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer 13, 207
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Xu Y, Li Q, Li XY, Yang QY, Xu WW and Liu GL (2012) Short-term anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment elicits vasculogenic mimicry formation of tumors to accelerate metastasis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 31, 16
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  20. Carmeliet P (2005) Angiogenesis in life, disease and medicine. Nature 438, 932-936
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Boocock CA, Charnock-Jones DS, Sharkey AM et al (1995) Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors flt and KDR in ovarian carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 87, 506-516
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Chen Y, Zhang L, Liu WX and Wang K (2018) VEGF and SEMA4D have synergistic effects on the promotion of angiogenesis in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cell Mol Biol Lett 23, 2
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Wang JY, Sun T, Zhao XL et al (2008) Functional significance of VEGF-a in human ovarian carcinoma: role in vasculogenic mimicry. Cancer Biol Ther 7, 758-766
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Reinthaller A (2016) Antiangiogenic therapies in ovarian cancer. Memo 9, 139-143
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  25. Markowska A, Sajdak S, Markowska J and Huczynski A (2017) Angiogenesis and cancer stem cells: New perspectives on therapy of ovarian cancer. Eur J Med Chem 142, 87-94
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Richardson DL (2019) New and Novel Therapies for Gynecologic Cancers. Semin Oncol Nurs 35, 217-219
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Cortez AJ, Tudrej P, Kujawa KA and Lisowska KM (2018) Advances in ovarian cancer therapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 81, 17-38
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  28. Wedge SR, Kendrew J, Hennequin LF et al (2005) AZD2171: a highly potent, orally bioavailable, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of cancer. Cancer Res 65, 4389-4400
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Ledermann JA, Embleton AC, Raja F et al (2016) Cediranib in patients with relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (ICON6): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 387, 1066-1074
    Pubmed CrossRef
  30. Raja FA, Griffin CL, Qian W et al (2011) Initial toxicity assessment of ICON6: a randomised trial of cediranib plus chemotherapy in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 105, 884-889
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Pick AM and Nystrom KK (2012) Pazopanib for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Clin Ther 34, 511-520
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Schoffski P (2012) Pazopanib in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 12, 711-723
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Pignata S, Lorusso D, Scambia G et al (2015) Pazopanib plus weekly paclitaxel versus weekly paclitaxel alone for platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory advanced ovarian cancer (MITO 11): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 16, 561-568
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. du Bois A, Floquet A, Kim JW et al (2014) Incorporation of pazopanib in maintenance therapy of ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 32, 3374-3382
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Floquet A, Vergote I, Colombo N et al (2015) Progression-free survival by local investigator versus independent central review: comparative analysis of the AGO-OVAR16 Trial. Gynecol Oncol 136, 37-42
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Awasthi N and Schwarz RE (2015) Profile of nintedanib in the treatment of solid tumors: the evidence to date. Onco Targets Ther 8, 3691-3701
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  37. Hughes G, Toellner H, Morris H, Leonard C and Chaudhuri N (2016) Real World Experiences: Pirfenidone and Nintedanib are Effective and Well Tolerated Treatments for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. J Clin Med 5, 78-89
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  38. du Bois A, Kristensen G, Ray-Coquard I et al (2016) Standard first-line chemotherapy with or without nintedanib for advanced ovarian cancer (AGO-OVAR 12): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 17, 78-89
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Monk BJ, Poveda A, Vergote I et al (2014) Anti-angiopoietin therapy with trebananib for recurrent ovarian cancer (TRINOVA-1): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15, 799-808
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. van Beijnum JR, Nowak-Sliwinska P, Huijbers EJ, Thijssen VL and Griffioen AW (2015) The great escape; the hallmarks of resistance to antiangiogenic therapy. Pharmacol Rev 67, 441-461
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Sood AK, Seftor EA, Fletcher MS et al (2001) Molecular determinants of ovarian cancer plasticity. Am J Pathol 158, 1279-1288
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  42. Jo HN, Kang H, Lee A et al (2017) Endothelial miR-26a regulates VEGF-Nogo-B receptor-mediated angiogenesis. BMB Rep 50, 384-389
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  43. Carmeliet P and Jain RK (2011) Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature 473, 298-307
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  44. Hendrix MJ, Seftor EA, Meltzer PS et al (2001) Expression and functional significance of VE-cadherin in aggressive human melanoma cells: role in vasculogenic mimicry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, 8018-8023
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  45. Du J, Sun B, Zhao X et al (2014) Hypoxia promotes vasculogenic mimicry formation by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition in ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 133, 575-583
    Pubmed CrossRef
  46. Liu W, Lv C, Zhang B, Zhou Q and Cao Z (2017) MicroRNA-27b functions as a new inhibitor of ovarian cancer-mediated vasculogenic mimicry through suppression of VE-cadherin expression. RNA 23, 1019-1027
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  47. Czekierdowski A, Czekierdowska S, Stachowicz N, Lozinski T and Gurynowicz G (2017) Mig-7 expression and vasculogenic mimicry in malignant ovarian tumors. Ginekol Pol 88, 552-561
    Pubmed CrossRef
  48. Lapeyre-Prost A, Terme M, Pernot S et al (2017) Immunomodulatory Activity of VEGF in Cancer. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 330, 295-342
    Pubmed CrossRef
  49. Jeong MS, Bae JS and Jin HK (2019) Vascular endothelial growth factor improves the therapeutic effects of cyclodextrin in Niemann-Pick type C mice. Anim Cells Syst (Seoul) 23, 346-354
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  50. Mei J, Gao Y, Zhang L et al (2008) VEGF-siRNA silencing induces apoptosis, inhibits proliferation and suppresses vasculogenic mimicry in osteosarcoma in vitro. Exp Oncol 30, 29-34
    Pubmed
  51. Qin L, Ren Y, Chen AM et al (2014) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligands inhibit VEGF-mediated vasculogenic mimicry of prostate cancer through the AKT signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep 10, 276-282
    Pubmed CrossRef
  52. Cong R, Sun Q, Yang L, Gu H, Zeng Y and Wang B (2009) Effect of Genistein on vasculogenic mimicry formation by human uveal melanoma cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 28, 124
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  53. Cheng N, Brantley DM, Liu H et al (2002) Blockade of EphA receptor tyrosine kinase activation inhibits vascular endothelial cell growth factor-induced angiogenesis. Mol Cancer Res 1, 2-11
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  54. Manandhar S and Lee YM (2018) Emerging role of RUNX3 in the regulation of tumor microenvironment. BMB Rep 51, 174-181
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  55. Zimna A and Kurpisz M (2015) Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 in Physiological and Pathophysiological Angiogenesis: Applications and Therapies. Biomed Res Int 2015, 549412
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  56. Yu K, Xiang L, Li S, Wang S, Chen C and Mu H (2019) HIF1alpha promotes prostate cancer progression by increasing ATG5 expression. Anim Cells Syst (Seoul) 23, 326-334
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  57. Zhang S, Zhang D and Sun B (2007) Vasculogenic mimicry: current status and future prospects. Cancer Lett 254, 157-164
    Pubmed CrossRef
  58. Sun B, Zhang D, Zhang S, Zhang W, Guo H and Zhao X (2007) Hypoxia influences vasculogenic mimicry channel formation and tumor invasion-related protein expression in melanoma. Cancer Lett 249, 188-197
    Pubmed CrossRef
  59. Su M, Feng YJ, Yao LQ et al (2008) Plasticity of ovarian cancer cell SKOV3ip and vasculogenic mimicry in vivo. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18, 476-486
    Pubmed CrossRef
  60. Herr F, Baal N, Reisinger K et al (2007) HCG in the regulation of placental angiogenesis. Results of an in vitro study. Placenta 28 Suppl A, S85-93
    Pubmed CrossRef
  61. Muller CY and Cole LA (2009) The quagmire of hCG and hCG testing in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 112, 663-672
    Pubmed CrossRef
  62. Su M, Wei W, Xu X et al (2011) Role of hCG in vasculogenic mimicry in OVCAR-3 ovarian cancer cell line. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21, 1366-1374
    Pubmed CrossRef
  63. Gao S, Fan C, Huang H, Zhu C, Su M and Zhang Y (2016) Effects of HCG on human epithelial ovarian cancer vasculogenic mimicry formation in vivo. Oncol Lett 12, 459-466
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  64. Qiao L, Gu Q, Dai Y et al (2008) XIAP-associated factor 1 (XAF1) suppresses angiogenesis in mouse endothelial cells. Tumour Biol 29, 122-129
    Pubmed CrossRef
  65. Zhu LM, Shi DM, Dai Q et al (2014) Tumor suppressor XAF1 induces apoptosis, inhibits angiogenesis and inhibits tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget 5, 5403-5415
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  66. Vartanian AA, Burova OS, Stepanova EV and Baryshnikov AY (2007) The involvement of apoptosis in melanoma vasculogenic mimicry. Melanoma Res 17, 1-8
    Pubmed CrossRef
  67. Wang Y, Liu P, Wang X and Mao H (2017) Role of Xlinked inhibitor of apoptosisassociated factor1 in vasculogenic mimicry in ovarian cancer. Mol Med Rep 16, 325-330
    Pubmed CrossRef
  68. Dejana E (2010) The role of wnt signaling in physiological and pathological angiogenesis. Circ Res 107, 943-952
    Pubmed CrossRef
  69. Kim NH, Lee Y and Yook JI (2018) Dishevelling Wnt and Hippo. BMB Rep 51, 425-426
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  70. Qi H, Sun B, Zhao X et al (2014) Wnt5a promotes vasculogenic mimicry and epithelial-mesenchymal transition via protein kinase Calpha in epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncol Rep 32, 771-779
    Pubmed CrossRef
  71. Rabbani SA and Mazar AP (2001) The role of the plasminogen activation system in angiogenesis and metastasis. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 10, 393-415, x
    Pubmed CrossRef
  72. Tang J, Wang J, Fan L et al (2016) cRGD inhibits vasculogenic mimicry formation by down-regulating uPA expression and reducing EMT in ovarian cancer. Oncotarget 7, 24050-24062
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  73. Sestito R, Cianfrocca R, Rosano L et al (2016) Macitentan blocks endothelin-1 receptor activation required for chemoresistant ovarian cancer cell plasticity and metastasis. Life Sci 159, 43-48
    Pubmed CrossRef
  74. Orecchia P, Balza E, Pietra G et al (2019) L19-IL2 Immunocytokine in Combination with the Anti-Syndecan-1 46F2SIP Antibody Format: A New Targeted Treatment Approach in an Ovarian Carcinoma Model. Cancers (Basel) 11, 1232-1250
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  75. Kim J (2018) MicroRNAs as critical regulators of the endothelial to mesenchymal transition in vascular biology. BMB Rep 51, 65-72
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  76. Hernandez R, Sanchez-Jimenez E, Melguizo C, Prados J and Rama AR (2018) Downregulated microRNAs in the colorectal cancer: diagnostic and therapeutic perspectives. BMB Rep 51, 563-571
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  77. Suh N (2018) MicroRNA controls of cellular senescence. BMB Rep 51, 493-499
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  78. Kinose Y, Sawada K, Nakamura K and Kimura T (2014) The role of microRNAs in ovarian cancer. Biomed Res Int 2014, 249393
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  79. Sun Q, Zou X, Zhang T, Shen J, Yin Y and Xiang J (2014) The role of miR-200a in vasculogenic mimicry and its clinical significance in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 132, 730-738
    Pubmed CrossRef
  80. Salinas-Vera YM, Gallardo-Rincon D, Garcia-Vazquez R et al (2019) HypoxamiRs Profiling Identify miR-745 as a Regulator of the Early Stages of Vasculogenic Mimicry in SKOV3 Ovarian Cancer Cells. Front Oncol 9, 381
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  81. Cao L, Wan Q, Li F and Tang CE (2018) MiR-363 inhibits cisplatin chemoresistance of epithelial ovarian cancer by regulating snail-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. BMB Rep 51, 456-461
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  82. Choi PW and Ng SW (2017) The Functions of MicroRNA-200 Family in Ovarian Cancer: Beyond Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Int J Mol Sci 18, 1207-1226
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  83. Monk BJ, Minion LE and Coleman RL (2016) Anti-angiogenic agents in ovarian cancer: past, present, and future. Ann Oncol 27 Suppl 1, i33-i39
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef

This Article


Cited By Articles

Author ORCID Information

Funding Information
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
      10.13039/501100004085
      NRF-2016R1A5A1011974, NRF-2019R1A2C4069815, 2017R1D1A1B03034206

Collections

Services
Social Network Service

e-submission

Search for

Archives